PDA

View Full Version : Does noone code VB anymore?

nscopex
05-22-2003, 01:56 PM
How many still use vb?
leblitzer
05-22-2003, 06:15 PM
soz ns i deleted VB :( i am leanin C#
nscopex
05-22-2003, 08:12 PM
when did this happen.,.. the chess client..:(
leblitzer
05-23-2003, 09:23 AM
oh that client ! donno tell to your bro to hook me up :)
pugamsish
05-23-2003, 09:27 AM
VB is so easy to learn. I know it.
-ßéñ©Ø-
05-23-2003, 01:08 PM
yea, I am starting to learn too, can you help a little maybe.
pugamsish
05-23-2003, 02:36 PM
sure, ask me any question you have.
kdawg56_99
05-23-2003, 02:50 PM
Also, as i pointed out in puga's thread in chess there is some guy named vina from www.pracker.com who knows tons about vb. Peace.
nscopex
05-28-2003, 02:45 PM
VINA doesnt know ****
leblitzer
08-24-2003, 04:38 PM
Originally posted by nscopex
VINA doesnt know ****
he changed his sn is x_x_vina_x_x
leblitzer
08-24-2003, 04:42 PM
Originally posted by nscopex
How many still use vb?
vb su>< :p
John-
08-24-2003, 06:14 PM
hey nscopex dont have to worry bout people using vb bill gates plans to revolutionise the programming world by making it commercial are still very active.
and if i am not mistaken it is the biggest home user language around.
just curious what the biggest industrial language would be?dont most major corporations have there own slightly different coding programs?
pugamsish
08-25-2003, 09:03 AM
Leb, vb sucks cuz you dont know it, you dont konw any language, because you suck ass.
baloney_mahoney
08-25-2003, 06:05 PM
VB is not used in enterprize developement because it's too damn sluggish, memory hog, too ****in slow and lacks alot of functionality. It's OK for you guys but not in the big time world of software development. "C" is the primer language, so be it.

By the way, anyone know of a Java compiler that can compile numberic classes(like the ones that Yahoo has... 0.class, 1.class, 2.class, etc etc). None of mine will allow it. So how's it done?
pugamsish
08-26-2003, 05:41 PM
Try Edit Plus 3.2 (I believe thats the current version) The java file has to be named 0.java or whatever. I don't know if it is allowed.
baloney_mahoney
08-26-2003, 05:56 PM
I have a java class-to-java-source program that will convert all the yahoo classes to source but they wind up as _cls0.java, _cls1.java, etc. Then I compile these and the results winds up _cls0.class, _cls1.class, _cls2.class, etc. The problem is that some of the java source files wont compile because of java source errors. In some cases I can correct the error in the source and recompile but there are errors I cannot correct and therefore I do not get a complete compile and of course they wont run correctly.
Bunch of damn crap if you ask me.
I have no idea how Yahoo is able to compile 0.java into 0.class etc because all of my Java compiliers wont allow names to begin with a number but Yahoo does it and thats a fact. So, they must have some compilier that does allow numbers as the 1st charactor of a class name.
pugamsish
08-26-2003, 08:23 PM
They probably developed their own.
Mark__C
08-26-2003, 08:30 PM
Originally posted by baloney_mahoney
I have a java class-to-java-source program that will convert all the yahoo classes to source but they wind up as _cls0.java, _cls1.java, etc. Then I compile these and the results winds up _cls0.class, _cls1.class, _cls2.class, etc. The problem is that some of the java source files wont compile because of java source errors. In some cases I can correct the error in the source and recompile but there are errors I cannot correct and therefore I do not get a complete compile and of course they wont run correctly.
Bunch of damn crap if you ask me.
I have no idea how Yahoo is able to compile 0.java into 0.class etc because all of my Java compiliers wont allow names to begin with a number but Yahoo does it and thats a fact. So, they must have some compilier that does allow numbers as the 1st charactor of a class name.

lol, get a clue
pugamsish
08-26-2003, 08:31 PM
ahaha
baloney_mahoney
08-28-2003, 01:18 AM
I suppose it is possible that Yahoo has their own Java compilier and it is probably not so uncommon for large companies to develope their own compliers and assemblers.

The first time I recompiled Yahoo's converted applets about 2 years agao I had about 20 applets with compile errors.

This time when I compiled their lastest update only 4 applets had compile errors. I was able to patch three of them but the one I couldnt patch or get around was one of the primary applets and that stopped everything.

Oh well, I'm sure you dont give a damn about any of this.